As the dispute continues, there seems to be be more twists and turns. Over the past week, things have become more complex. Things became even more complex when DirecTV filed a complaint with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) accusing Disney of negotiating in bad faith.
This complaint focuses on the “skinny” channel bundles offered by Disney, which included ABC and ESPN, making the bundle very sports focused.
However, DirecTV were not impressed with this offer, claiming that Disney used this package to mainly benefit themeslves rather than both parties.
They said ““Disney wants to force DIRECTV to carry a “fat bundle” including less desirable Disney programming—whileitself offering cheaper, “skinnier” bundles of programming that consumers want,”
DirecTV also asked for Disney to keep Disney-owned channels in bundle that was set for broadcasting only. However, Disney rejected this idea. If this package was to go ahead, there would only be stations included in eight markets. This package would certainly cause issues with minimum penetrations requirements.
Despite this, DirecTV claim that this is not at the root of their complaints. Their issue came with Disney requesting a “clean slate” in their negotiations, which would be prevent DirecTV from suing Disney in the future or complaining about any past actions they have taken.
DirecTV said: One thing Disney may not do is ask DIRECTV to cede its right to file a complaint at the Commission based on theory that Disney acted in bad faith by bundling—or based on any other theory for that matter. The rules and orders do not permit that,”
There are some big events coming up, such as the first “Monday Night Football” game of 2024 on the way, as well as the Kamala Harris and Donald Trump debate on Tuesday. This could lead to the two streaming giants coming to agrrement in quick fashion, but some would question if this dispute as gone too far for any reconciliation.
